On Acceptance

There is so much hub­bub around us about self-help and improve­ment that the key pre­con­di­tion of per­son­al change — self-accep­tance — often gets com­plete­ly lost. I’m as guilty of this one as any­body, and maybe more than most. If you are inter­est­ed, as I am, in all things self-actu­al­ized, you too may expe­ri­ence the dilem­ma. With all the books and tapes and learn­ing groups out there, it is very easy to fall into the pit of con­stant­ly attend­ing to the gap between the ide­al and the real — what I should be rather than what I am. For me, a con­tribut­ing fac­tor is my con­sult­ing work in orga­ni­za­tions specif­i­cal­ly help­ing peo­ple rec­og­nize, under­stand, and work with lead­er­ship and orga­ni­za­tion­al gaps. In the process I know I can eas­i­ly “over-focus” on my own ideals, los­ing sight of the fact that human change is most­ly not a lin­ear jour­ney, but an organ­ic one that para­dox­i­cal­ly begins with aware­ness and accep­tance of the parts that are not changing. 

For me, Rogers’ quo­ta­tion points to the soft­est tis­sue of the soul. I attend­ed a recent work­shop at which I believe the leader, Jim Sorensen, beau­ti­ful­ly mod­eled what Rogers’ self-accep­tance actu­al­ly means. Faced with a par­tic­i­pant try­ing to con­vince Jim in front of the hun­dred or so peo­ple in the class that he should sim­ply “love his stuff,” no mat­ter what it is, Jim very hon­est­ly and vul­ner­a­bly stat­ed that no, there were parts of him­self he could not yet love. In doing so he mod­eled a deep hon­esty. By what he said and how he said it, and per­haps with­out any spe­cial inten­tion, Jim made it safe for every­one there to also acknowl­edge parts of them­selves that make com­plete self-love dif­fi­cult. And he demon­strat­ed how, even with­out that final self-love, there can also be self-acceptance. 

I can imag­ine a long argu­ment here about the sim­i­lar­i­ties and dif­fer­ences between love and accep­tance, and I’d rather not fall into that seman­tic whirlpool. But I do want to rein­force the impor­tance of Jim’s gift to the audi­ence. With accep­tance, I believe that love, maybe cap­i­tal L kind of love, comes of its own accord and from “out­side.” With accep­tance comes grace, comes heal­ing, comes change into our lives, and they come from some­place beyond our­selves and yet in a way that is com­plete­ly intrin­sic to who we are.

Dreamcatchers: Ethnic Fest ’08, Tacoma WA

Last week, Karen Lynch of Ver­mont Diary sent me this com­pelling sto­ry of con­ver­sion and grace. While I do not iden­ti­fy myself as a Chris­t­ian, and I cer­tain­ly am not in any place to make a judg­ment about the mean­ing of Karen’s expe­ri­ence, what is unde­ni­able is that some­how a door of tran­scen­dence opened for her in a sin­gle moment, as per­haps it can for any one of us. Maybe that moment is always hap­pen­ing, if only we have suf­fi­cient clar­i­ty to see its con­stant unfolding.

I believe what Rogers is talk­ing about all the pri­vate, prayer­ful nuances of let­ting go, of find­ing the end, of sim­ply being, of accept­ing — that things are okay, that I’m okay. Prob­a­bly most­ly this is an uncon­scious process of open­ing, of blos­som­ing, where some­thing redi­rects us and helps us regain our hold on our fun­da­men­tal inter­con­nect­ed­ness. The True Self. In my work I see lead­ers who attempt to sub­sti­tute their hard work, achieve­ments and intel­li­gence for the serum of self-accep­tance, lead­ers who are nev­er enough to them­selves yet refuse to go through the eye of the nee­dle in order to expe­ri­ence some­thing else. Truth be told, I iden­ti­fy with them. And yet I also see the pos­si­bil­i­ties of tran­scen­dence, which come from adver­si­ty and from ques­tions that can’t be answered, only lived. When I am stopped cold by self-made pain, indeed it is then most fre­quent­ly that the out­lines of a new door begin to appear on an oth­er­wise seam­less inner wall. 

Technorati Tag:
Published
Categorized as Healing

By Dan Oestreich

I am a consultant, coach, facilitator and trainer supporting the growth and development of leaders and teams. For further information about my work and services, please access my Oestreich Associates website.

5 comments

  1. Thank you so much for this post, Dan. Well-stat­ed and time­ly for me. I’ve shared over at Eas­i­ly Amazed a prac­tice that emerged recent­ly to help me with my self-acceptance.

    With grat­i­tude,
    Ashley

  2. Dan: thanks for shar­ing your insights and expe­ri­ences at the work­shop — sounds like a mov­ing expe­ri­ence in mul­ti­ple dimensions!

    Your note about “human change is most­ly not a lin­ear jour­ney” reminds me of Steven Jay Gould’s con­cept of punc­tu­at­ed equi­lib­ri­um, where­in change hap­pens in wide­ly vary­ing lev­els of inten­si­ty over time.

    I enjoyed read­ing about Karen Lynch’s con­ver­sion expe­ri­ence — it’s amaz­ing what we can expe­ri­ence when we just loosen up a bit an open to pos­si­b­li­ties (or unfold­ings, as it were).

    And, of course, I am always drawn to any­thing that helps reveal our “fun­da­men­tal inter­con­nect­ed­ness” … well, at least, some­times I am. There are oth­er times when I am unwill­ng or unable to con­nect … and that is a part of me I am unwill­ing or unable to love … but I am will­ing to accept that part of me … at least in the spir­it of this moment.

  3. The beau­ty of your com­ment, Joe, is in the last part. As this post sug­gests, it seems to me the gift is with­in our aware­ness — and accep­tance — of the parts of us we con­sid­er most unwor­thy of love. Per­haps this is because accep­tance invites two almost mag­i­cal things to hap­pen: 1) we step back and in doing so remove some of the “fish­hooks” of pri­vate pain that keep us blind (grief shared becomes bear­able); and 2) in expe­ri­enc­ing your accep­tance I also see the poten­tial of my own; in mine, you see some­thing else of yours. Aware­ness comes, and with it heal­ing, through mutu­al­i­ty. Con­scious­ness cre­ates itself in each of us, and then via com­mu­ni­ty, in one anoth­er. Could there be a bet­ter form of art or more spec­tac­u­lar evi­dence of grace?

  4. Hmm, I see two pos­si­ble inter­pre­ta­tions of this mutu­al­i­ty: your accep­tance of your­self gives me per­mis­sion to accept myself … and/or your accep­tance of me gives me per­mis­sion to accept myself. I sup­pose the mutu­al rein­force­ment aris­es in either interpretation.

    On a lighter note, I just hap­pened to watch “Some­thing About Mary” this week­end, so your ref­er­ence to fish­hooks was espe­cial­ly evocative.

  5. Once one lets go of the exter­nal trap­pings of the ego, and exists as the vul­ner­a­ble beast of benign sur­vival, then one more appre­ci­ates the integri­ty and sacred­ness of all that is about him, thus pass­ing through the eye-of-the-needle

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.