Bad Faith

When French exis­ten­tial­ist philoso­pher Jean-Paul Sartre coined the phrase “bad faith,” he was refer­ring to any form of self-decep­tion that denies the exis­tence of human free­dom. When some­one says he “had no choice,” this points direct­ly to an illu­sion, for Sartre con­tend­ed that we always have a choice; even in not choos­ing we make one. When we pre­tend to be forced by con­di­tions or oblig­a­tions to make a cer­tain deci­sion, we are lying to our­selves. We always have free­dom, although the choos­ing can be enor­mous­ly dif­fi­cult or painful pre­cise­ly because there are always consequences. 

While I’m not a fan of all exis­ten­tial­ist thought, I do find the con­cept of bad faith to be fun­da­men­tal to lead­ing authen­ti­cal­ly. I recall work­ing with a gov­ern­ment exec­u­tive who led a 2,000 per­son orga­ni­za­tion. I sug­gest­ed one evening that per­haps he could inter­vene in a sit­u­a­tion where key staff were band­ing togeth­er and hir­ing per­son­al lawyers to address the immi­nent pos­si­bil­i­ty of inter-employ­ee law­suits in his agency. Ten­sions were run­ning very high and the clear desire of many was that he spend a few min­utes talk­ing with peo­ple, reduc­ing peo­ples’ fears, encour­ag­ing and sup­port­ing them to work through the prob­lems. He looked at me in com­plete frustration:

“What you don’t under­stand, Dan,” he said to me, “is that I have no pow­er.” He went on to explain how his actions were con­strained by law, by the pre­rog­a­tives of the Human Resources Direc­tor who report­ed to him, by com­mu­ni­ty and inter­nal pol­i­tics. There was noth­ing, after all, that he could do to pre­vent peo­ple from hir­ing lawyers. Lis­ten­ing to him, he cer­tain­ly seemed buf­fet­ed by forces beyond his con­trol. He seemed to have turned him­self into a a dead or pas­sive thing rather than stand­ing in the place of his per­son­al and orga­ni­za­tion­al capa­bil­i­ty. This is what I think it means to oper­ate in bad faith. 

Every day in lit­tle ways we can hide from our choice points and fail to take direct respon­si­bil­i­ty for our deci­sions. I believe we do so out of a fear of who we are, a fear of being an out­lier of some kind. We wor­ry about our loss­es — rep­u­ta­tion, mon­ey, stature, friend­ships. And in these eco­nom­ic times, the temp­ta­tion to hun­ker down, to be less real to our­selves and oth­ers, to avoid our choic­es and to go along becomes increas­ing­ly palat­able. And yet this is the last thing that we need right now as orga­ni­za­tions. This is the time when the cre­ative human spir­it exer­cis­ing free­dom to decide, to choose, will be the most valuable. 

I remem­ber years ago in anoth­er orga­ni­za­tion fac­ing lay­offs how the leader want­ed to keep the bad news hid­den until the last pos­si­ble moment. He excused this by say­ing that he did­n’t want to “scare peo­ple.” But of course there are no secrets real­ly, and peo­ple knew that change was com­ing. They were already scared, and only he seemed not to know it. His mis­placed “pro­tec­tion” of his employ­ees actu­al­ly treat­ed them like things or chil­dren, rather than as mature indi­vid­u­als who also pos­sess the free­dom to choose. In truth the only per­son being pro­tect­ed was him­self. He had told him­self a sto­ry about why he could not be more open.

In the cur­rent and com­ing dif­fi­cult times, we are both togeth­er in our hard choic­es and alone with them. Sartre also said that free­dom involves the anquish of mak­ing dif­fi­cult deci­sions — ones where we have no roadmap and those poten­tial­ly hurt­ful to oth­ers. We’ll have plen­ty of such choic­es, includ­ing how to change our orga­ni­za­tions, how to com­mu­ni­cate those changes, how to fos­ter and sup­port a sense of strength and respon­si­bil­i­ty in every­one. There is a bud­dhist say­ing to the effect that “even walk­ing across a mead­ow kills a few blades of grass.” This means that if we choose to cross the mead­ow, to make change, then it will nec­es­sar­i­ly have an effect. If we can’t han­dle that thought, move­ment of any kind quick­ly becomes impossible.

As I write these words, I feel in my chest the bur­dens and strengths that have come from my own choic­es. I feel my past, my projects, rela­tion­ships retained and lost…my deci­sions. Some­times I have expe­ri­enced regret for those choic­es. As Sheryl Crow sings in The Dif­fi­cult Kind,”…there ain’t noth­ing like regret to remind you you’re alive.” But in the end, all the choic­es add up and hold around a cen­ter that is the per­son I have deter­mined myself to be.

Exis­ten­tial per­spec­tives push us — face first — into the walls of what we don’t want to own, what we dis­place and dis­card, what we ratio­nal­ize about our­selves and our beliefs. We are pushed into all those things we want to be uncon­scious about in our­selves. In such bright light, as lead­ers, we may find that some of our truths are our most telling false­hoods, some of our right­eous­ness is based on insen­si­tiv­i­ty and igno­rance, some of our choic­es for our­selves and oth­ers are noth­ing but a dis­as­ter in the mak­ing. The boon of such per­spec­tives, as hard as stone, is their require­ment that we wake up from our pas­siv­i­ty, that we wake from the bad dreams of a naive self. 

Once awak­ened, I believe, then some­thing else has room to come in. (This is where I leave the exis­ten­tial pack.) Call it grace or com­pas­sion, maybe the waters of for­give­ness. It goes by many names, and it is true and real only if it flows upon the bedrock of what actu­al­ly is.

Technorati Tag:
Published
Categorized as Choices

By Dan Oestreich

I am a consultant, coach, facilitator and trainer supporting the growth and development of leaders and teams. For further information about my work and services, please access my Oestreich Associates website.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.