Reading once again the reflections of those of you who responded to the post, The Unfolding That Cannot Be Contained, I am deeply struck by the different ways we come at our notions of this thing we call leadership. From Ashley’s comment about “surrendering to power that moves through and honoring the power in all,” to Dan Leahy’s thoughts about “a living system’s felt need to change,” to Jay’s words on leader as “community builder,” to Karen’s “problems of vocabulary,” it is a fascinating array. I am moved by these different slants of light that flicker through the window.…and am again grateful for this forum.
I am sometimes faced with audiences that seem to me like they want such a hard, definitive, literal answers: here is what leadership is; here are the five (or six or seven) qualities that define it; here is the way you evaluate yourself to make sure you are effective in each of these pre-defined areas — as if reality could be pinned down so neatly and easily.
I am prone, instead, to simply ask people for their views and do a simple exercise. The exercise goes like this:
Please draw a line down the middle of a sheet of paper. At the top of the right hand column write the word “Vision,” meaning your vision of an effective leader — basically the kind of leader you’d like to be. Write whatever you want: traits, qualities, behavior, modes, theory, practice, private definitions — anything. At the top of the left hand, write the word column “Anti-Vision” and now write anything you like about the kind of leader you would never want to be. There is no right or wrong about these columns. They are grasped intuitively and felt, the product of so much real personal experience and conditioning. The words that people come up with don’t necessarily correspond to the categories laid out by leadership writers like Bennis, Drucker, Kouses and Posner, Koestenbaum, Quinn, whomever, although often there is a relationship of some kind. Mostly the words come from what we’ve seen of our real teachers, the mentors, authority figures, and the bad managers that have shown up in our lives, and the words come from the heart. Do this exercise right now if you like, before reading further.
Okay, got your lists? Now do this. Go to the right hand column and circle the words that represent your strongest “gift” (strength, talent) as a leader. This might be something you take for granted about yourself, but others see in you and especially respect you for. Sometimes it takes a moment to let go of a little modesty. Just acknowledge it, whatever it is. Now take a look at your anti-vision statements. What is it that “leaks” out of you from time to time, unintentionally or impulsively, and in a way that you can see it and feel some shame. For a moment, let’s call this “shadow.” Circle the word or words that are shadow for you. [A supervisor described this as the qualities of “my evil sister who comes to work in my place once in awhile”]. So now you’ve written your own criteria for what a leader should be and should avoid being, and you are using this as a mirror to think about your strongest gift and your most uncomfortable shadow.
Often there is some type of connection between the two. A manager once said to me she thought her gift was her genuine passion for her work. But she added that her shadow was her “intensity” with other people when she was under pressure. A strength taken too far in her view. Another manager told me he was able to bring people together to collaborate — except when he became quite autocratic. A shadow undermining his gift.
Why do this exercise? Well, after working with it with hundreds of people I would say the main benefit is to get completely away from intellectualizing the answer to the question, “What does it mean to be a good leader?” It gets us away from believing someone actually knows the full story, knows our full story. That kind of believing can lead to such abstraction — as if there were some final answer and if we talk enough it will materialize. I’m more interested in the part of us that already seems to have some answers to that question and from a distinctly personal vantage point. Of course we all want to stretch and grow and learn to see what others believe about this topic. [In a group setting, as people share their visions and anti-visions I encourage all to add words they like to their own lists.]
What I believe is that at the end of the day, in the practical dynamics of the worlds within which we operate, these private views and judgments of self often are so much stronger grooves for actual behavior and actual feeling. Rubbing up against the stones of daily experience, a person expresses the beauty and ugliness of real human temperament — displaying gifts that no one has ever thought to record as part of some image of effective leadership; and similarly their shadows.
Facing our own definitions means we face a mirror, not an outside expert — which seems eminently appropriate to me for a study of such a personal thing as leadership. It can be interesting to think about just how we got the mirror we just discovered. Said another way, the exercise helps us begin to acknowledge how the mirror of our own self-judgments has been operating for some time now.
With my mirror in front of me I can begin to ask new questions and determine whether the mirror in fact is accurate. Perhaps I see myself as indecisive — and it is this very negative view that pushes me to make such bad snap decisions. Or I see myself as uncreative — despite the evidence of so many original projects and ideas. I can ask others what they think, what they see — whether they sense I am accurate in my self-views or not.
And I can become curious. I may not have to spend a lot of money at the institute to find out some truth about me and my leadership.
I may just have to find a mirror and then ask that most telling question, “Is it true?”

Dan, a really brilliant post. I just blogged on it at:
http://imaginactive.blogspot.com/2005/02/leadership-is-truly-personal.html
I really like the exercise that you use. I think we turn to leadership gurus perhaps too much (me being a prime culprit) when it comes to seeking that one tip that’s going to transform our leadership abilities. Thanks for reminding us that we have everything we need if we just trust ourselves a bit more.
Thanks, Dan, that helps. For me, the question then is not so much what kind of leader am I, but how do I best bring my particular gifts to bear in each situation. In my office, I must be a leader, because to delegate too much would be burdensome to my team. In more broad-based groups, I need to be a supportive participant, often bringing to the table my ability to structure issues into action steps and gain buy-in from others. In both settings, I am often asking about goals, breaking work into components, planning sequence and priority of those tasks, checking status, and always, always cheerleading: that’s great! you’re the best! we are really getting somewhere now!
There’s the common thread.
You are so right about the shadow. We are too ready to beat ourselves up over its appearance. Did you ever try to ride a bike exactly along a narrow line–very hard, requires too many small corrections, results in tension. To the contrary, allow for swings a foot to either side of the line…much easier, now we’re getting where we wanted to go with much less energy and we’re having fun.