The weather here is (finally) good enough for a touch of Spring Fever, and so I am reminded of childhood. My older brother and I grew up on twelve acres of land, half forested, half in fields and orchard. At this time of the year he and I would spend much of our time in the forest, which was waking up with all sorts of green-gold leaves and pungent smells of the earth. We would dart off into the woods at a moment’s notice to build a new trail, camp or treehouse.
What I recollected this morning was the energy we used to do all that work. “Why did we want to build a treehouse?” I asked myself, and could only respond, “for the fun of it, and because we could.”
Contrast that to so much that happens in our organizations today — where the “fun of it” often hardly matters or does not matter at all.
The difference is in the evaluation and demanding measurement of things, perhaps; the constant need to perform, to show, to prove — or be labelled, castigated, threatened in subtle ways with disapproval and sanctioning. Yet I doubt my brother and I ever performed better than when at play we figured out what to do about the sudden urge to put planks in trees. “You go back to the house and get some boards, a hammer and nails. I think there’s some boards behind the garage. I’m going to go over to the neighbors and see if there is anybody who wants to help and who has some rope to pull the boards up.” Is it any wonder that modern management often fails? Translating to such a project would look like, “Okay, let’s first write down your accountabilities and deadlines. It’ll be up to you to go find the wood, so don’t screw that up. Your department’s hammer can’t be trusted and you certainly can’t borrow mine, but let’s collaborate and be a real team anyway. Let’s innovate! Oh, and I’m not paying for any of the nails, either. BTW, there will be a behind-the-scenes review of your performance at the end of this that will go back to your boss…”
You get the idea. And yet I think organizations kind of want it both ways these days: a highly engaged, passionate, excited workforce, plus high levels of measurement and evaluation. Can both exist together?
This cuts to the quick when we get to the really squishy stuff, like performance as a leader, executive or manager. There the process of self-evaluation has already become deeply ingrained in a fearful, depressive, defensive way. I won’t say “naturally” defensive, because in truth if building ourselves were like building a treehouse that defensiveness might “naturally” go away.
This is just a playful thought, of course, but perhaps one with a point. Can simultaneously we be really open and yet still be subject to critical voices about our performance? Can I receive feedback from you about ways I might improve as a leader and yet think of it as helping me with the next great way to create myself, my life, and my accomplishments?
Wouldn’t that be amazing — to somehow totally drop the fear surrounding evaluation of all kinds; somehow get the information and the learning, the enrichment and growth without all that anxiety — for the fun of it, and because we can? We would pull the planks up by rope with our friends, helping each other, and at the end of the day say to ourselves, admiring the view from up there, “Isn’t this cool?”
Perhaps Spring Fever has some business value after all.

It can exist.…evaluation without judgement, fear and anxiety.…but it requires love and compassion, which is often not welcome (or at least openly) in the workplace.
So, I guess it’s time to change the workplace…through who we are…as best we can…whenever we can!
So, I guess it’s time to change the workplace…through who are…as best we can…whenever we can!
…through who WE are…
It can exist.…evalua​tion without judgement, fear and anxiety.…but it requires love and compassion, which is often not welcome (or at least openly) in the workplace.
So, I guess it’s time to change the workplace…thr​ough who are…as best we can…whenever we can!