Consciousness Is The Only Real Power

Of course, there must have been plen­ty of evo­lu­tion­ary advan­tages to the enriched con­scious­ness of being human. That goes with­out say­ing. As we grow as indi­vid­u­als and as a race, it becomes more appar­ent exact­ly what those advan­tages are.

I am coach­ing some­one just now — I’ll call him Dave — who is work­ing on a part of him­self that is supreme­ly reac­tive and aggres­sive. We even have a name for this part of him — here I’ll call it “Bad” Dave. When Bad Dave gets tweaked by cir­cum­stances, he can be demand­ing, obnox­ious and incred­i­bly pushy, includ­ing phys­i­cal­ly threat­en­ing. He lives for con­trol and win­ning. Dave does­n’t like how it feels when Bad Dave takes over. That’s why he wants the coach­ing. My client is very, very smart and as a result any­thing that nar­rows him to sim­ply being reac­tionary is exhaust­ing and embar­rass­ing. In his own words, “it’s just not who I am.” 

Nev­er­the­less, things hap­pen. Over the last few weeks sev­er­al inci­dents have occurred where Bad Dave has had his way: a loud, pro­fane street argu­ment over a park­ing space, an aggres­sive and dan­ger­ous response to a car fol­low­ing too close­ly, a bru­tal­ly insult­ing con­ver­sa­tion over a cus­tomer ser­vice prob­lem, a near phys­i­cal con­fronta­tion with a stranger who was­n’t “fol­low­ing the rules” at his apart­ment com­plex. In each case, my client says Bad Dave has shown up “like a cave­man con­fronting a bear.”

Bear

“What’s trig­ger­ing you in these sit­u­a­tions?” I ask. “What do all these inci­dents have in common?”

We chew for awhile on that. It seems like in each case some­body has done some­thing slight­ly unrea­son­able — it does­n’t have to be much of a provo­ca­tion. It’s just a small act of “I’m in con­trol, not you, man” and Bad Dave shows up blaz­ing, using every ounce of machis­mo and clev­er­ness and pro­fan­i­ty avail­able to him in order to dri­ve the oth­er per­son into the ground. 

To be fair, Bad Dave, it turns out, has pro­vid­ed some pos­i­tive ser­vices to my client over many years, and this too, is part of the prob­lem. My client has been incred­i­bly suc­cess­ful in his very com­pet­i­tive voca­tion as a result of har­ness­ing Bad Dav­e’s ener­gy. Bad Dave has made lit­er­al­ly mil­lions of dol­lars on behalf of Dave. He does­n’t take no for an answer and he is not at all afraid of high stakes envi­ron­ments and aggres­sive deals with mega-bil­lion­aires. In fact, he just loves it there. So you can imag­ine that Bad Dave has got­ten lots of kudos and many rewards. The only prob­lem is Bad Dave does­n’t real­ly know where and when to stop. He’s a cave­man who uses the pri­mal ener­gy behind him to get his way and stay in con­trol. He’s a sur­vivor and he’s a killer.

We dis­cuss how it’s like­ly Bad Dave will show up increas­ing­ly because Dave is now well aware of him, and how dif­fer­ent he is from the whole per­son I’m coach­ing. To use a dif­fer­ent metaphor, it’s an inter­nal polit­i­cal strug­gle with­in Dav­e’s soul between the real Dave, a king, and a spoiled, “dark prince” who has both got­ten his way for a very long time and has proven his worth in pro­tect­ing the king from all com­ers. But with­out a war, Bad Dave seems to have less pur­pose. Now he’s look­ing for bat­tles. And he’s actu­al­ly get­ting in the way. Bad Dav­e’s time is past, and he does­n’t like the idea of los­ing such a pow­er­ful place in Dav­e’s inter­nal court.

Dave and I talk about slow­ing down the reac­tions; learn­ing to watch for the flash of emo­tion that pre­cedes Bad Dave going into action. What are those triggers?

And then, sud­den­ly, a moment of insight. Every time is a mir­ror. In every inci­dent it’s anoth­er Bad Dave that sets the wheel in motion. The inci­dents — some­body argu­ing about a park­ing space, some­body fol­low­ing too close­ly, a ser­vice per­son being insult­ing, a stranger not fol­low­ing the rules — guess who that is? 

Bad Dave.

Bad Dave sees Bad Dave — like a cat that sees itself in a mir­ror and growls. It’s part of him­self, fright­ened and aggres­sive. The bear sees the bear. The cave­man sees his twin — and the fight is on.

Ohhh, what’s out there is in here! What’s in here is out there!

We are not talk­ing about get­ting rid of Bad Dave. We are dis­cussing how to hon­or him, hon­or his accom­plish­ments — his past, most valu­able ser­vice.

And also now how to han­dle his demotion.

Hon­or­ing Bad Dave may sound counter-pro­duc­tive, but in truth, try­ing to pun­ish or sup­press Bad Dave gives him even more ener­gy. In part, there’s a les­son here about learn­ing how to befriend the very parts of our­selves that can hurt us — and others.

As I say, con­scious­ness must have had any num­ber of evo­lu­tion­ary advan­tages. We sit back. Dave is calmer. He total­ly under­stands this. 

“Maybe,” he says, “I real­ly ought to get to know that bear a lit­tle better.”

Link to blog posting.
Link to Oestreich Associates website.
Sign up for monthly email newsletter on reflective leadership.
Twitter @DanOestreich

[wdgpo_plusone]

By Dan Oestreich

I am a consultant, coach, facilitator and trainer supporting the growth and development of leaders and teams. For further information about my work and services, please access my Oestreich Associates website.

7 comments

  1. Hi Dan,
    Inter­est­ing sit­u­a­tion you describe. The ques­tion that pops to my mind is:
    —
    Does “bad Dave” ever use his strong urge to fight to defend oth­ers who are being used or mis­treat­ed (minus the phys­i­cal violence)?

    He defends him­self in ways that go too far. 

    By using his voice (not phys­i­cal vio­lence) to defend oth­ers, he can prac­tice the appro­pri­ate lim­its and techniques. 

    The objec­tiv­i­ty of help­ing some­one else gives per­spec­tive that fight­ing for your­self can­not. It also replaces the “me” focus to an inte­grat­ed focus with others.

    I wish Dave all the best.
    Kate

  2. Great ques­tion, Kate. Yes, “Bad Dave” does want to defend oth­ers — and I’d say he does — but not entire­ly with the effect hoped for. “Defend­ing” oth­ers can also take him to a pret­ty rough place. And, yes, he does go too far — although luck­i­ly, unlike so many oth­ers, he has asked for assis­tance. He absolute­ly knows there’s an issue and is quite gen­uine in his desire to shift his behav­ior. Part of the work for him will be talk­ing over with those he most cares about the actu­al impact of “Bad Dave” episodes on them, some­thing he’s not done in the past. 

    The very hope­ful thing about this sit­u­a­tion is that Dave, actu­al­ly quite a fab­u­lous guy, not Bad Dave, is the client.

  3. Dan, Thank you for a very thought-pro­vok­ing arti­cle. I like the idea of hon­or­ing Bad Dave for what he has accom­plished. It is so easy to think there is noth­ing good that comes from him, but under­stand­ing him bet­ter does a great ser­vice for your client. I would love to hear how this sit­u­a­tion evolves as you work with him.

  4. Thanks for stop­ping by, Lyn. Yes, it has been very easy to judge Dave, and that’s been a loss for him and for others. 

    The point about hon­or­ing Bad Dave is cru­cial. The nobler aspects of the pow­er Dave is overus­ing and some­times dis­tort­ing — becom­ing Bad Dave — should not be lost. Try­ing to sup­press or iso­late this part of him makes neg­a­tive “erup­tions” that much more like­ly. To influ­ence him pos­i­tive­ly, give him his due, a place and a purpose.

    Per­haps I will be able to report back lat­er on my work with this client lat­er. Thanks for putting that “bug in my ear.”

  5. Good stuff, Dan. 

    I’d say “Bad Dave” is nei­ther bad nor wrong. No judg­ment. He just is and is using some defend­ed action to keep him­self feel­ing safe or, as you say, in control. 

    The fact that he is con­scious of this part of him­self is ter­rif­ic, and nec­es­sary for change to occur. 

    I’m curi­ous if he could have achieved some of his “Bad Dave” suc­cess­es with­out being “Bad Dave?” Per­haps a mod­est test might be in order in some future expe­ri­ence to be curi­ous, to exper­i­ment with­out first resort­ing to “Bad Dave.”

    I’m also curi­ous when he first dis­cov­ered “Bad Dave.” How old was he? What was hap­pen­ing and exp­plore how has he car­ried that young behav­ior (which kept him feel­ing safe and secure then) into adult­hood where it is appar­ent­ly caus­ing him some fla­vor of pain and suffering.

    Can he see that “that was then and this is now” and per­haps see an (ener­getic) dif­fer­ence or shift in how he might respond/react?

    Final­ly, what is it like to give up his need to con­trol? Who would he be(come) then? Is that the truth? Would he lose some sense of iden­ti­ty? Would that be ok? Would he feel like he’s disintegrating…and why? Can he exper­i­ment with this?

    He tru­ly is at the edge of this chap­ter of self-knowledge.

  6. Peter — great to see you here!

    You have offered some beau­ti­ful obser­va­tions and ques­tions (as I would have expect­ed of you!)

    There was a peri­od of time when Dave learned, “Bad Dave,” and it’s a rich sto­ry of for­mer rela­tion­ships, love and death. To share too much more would be to com­pro­mise the anonymi­ty of the post, but your ques­tion of con­scious­ness re: “that was then, this is now” is absolute­ly on point. The sto­ry revolves around what it took to sur­vive and suc­ceed, as “Bad Dave” in the past and tru­ly taught him to act as a hard-nosed sur­vivor. There are, of course, fam­i­ly antecedents.

    The great news is that Dave is see­ing “Bad Dave” ever more clear­ly and sep­a­rat­ing use­ful behav­ior that may be mere­ly com­pet­i­tive from oth­er forms that are not just com­pet­i­tive but intim­i­dat­ing or threat­en­ing. Our work is to inte­grate the ener­gy, and make sure it is not overused but finds a noble place in his inte­ri­or court.

    As you can imag­ine, that’s hard work, and I can’t say enough good things about Dav­e’s devo­tion to the work. We have recent­ly talked a lot about the four stages of learn­ing: mov­ing from uncon­scious incom­pe­tence to con­scious incom­pe­tence, and then to con­scious com­pe­tence and uncon­scious com­pe­tence. We are study­ing what’s hap­pen­ing right now at the con­scious incom­pe­tence stage, and that’s often a chal­leng­ing and painful place where what was once a blind spot comes for­ward acutely.

    As to your last ques­tion I would say that Dave is work­ing toward a new form of authen­tic­i­ty and eth­i­cal behav­ior, is real­ly begin­ning to envi­sion him­self there, and also is learn­ing lots about trust, which he has some­times tried in the past to cre­ate through control. 

    I will study your ques­tions and obser­va­tions fur­ther, Peter, as I can see their great val­ue to our work.

    Best to you
    Dan

  7. Hi Dan,
    thanks for shar­ing this beau­ti­ful story.
    Bad Dave is of course part of Dave itself, a shad­owy facet that saved and made his life in the past.. Hon­or­ing Bad Dave sounds like the very right track to me, I would even say, learn­ing to love him, under­stand him, empathize — when and why is he com­ing on the front, how does he (Bad Dave) feel, what does he think…
    The mir­ror con­cept was a stoke of genius. Bad Dave becomes mad when he sees Bad Dave.. Anger is often a sec­ondary emo­tion, a blan­ket thrown upon a deep­er emo­tion that can’t come up — maybe fear, maybe sor­row, shame, … One pos­si­ble avenue, more in the “psy­cho” side of things, would be to dis­cuss with Bad Dave about his birth, his feel­ings, his his­to­ry, and soft­ly uncov­er the deep­er sto­ry below the anger blanket.
    On this track, hav­ing suc­ceed­ed in express­ing the mean­ing of his exis­tence, per­haps Bad Dave will agree to get coser to Dave, coop­er­ate, or some­how dis­solve with­in Dave while “aug­ment­ing” him.. And he will prob­a­bly remain avail­able in case clean­ing up the park­ing lot is real­ly useful !

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.