Three Voices: Truth, Kindness and Destiny

Over time, I’ve come to feel there are three inter­nal voic­es that influ­ence our larg­er choic­es. This is a metaphor­i­cal way of say­ing things — the voic­es I’m talk­ing about are just pat­terns of thought and perception:

Self-Truth: This voice pro­vides ongo­ing assess­ment of the real­i­ties we must face — both the exter­nal and the inter­nal ones. When impaired or not present, this voice can lead to self-decep­tion and dis­tor­tion. If there is “too much” self-truth we may be immo­bi­lized by its crit­i­cal judg­ments that we mis­in­ter­pret as truth. If “too lit­tle” we lose con­tact with reality.

Self-Kind­ness: This voice helps us expe­ri­ence our val­ue, bal­anced with the humil­i­ty brought by self-truth. When impaired or not present, it leads to loss of a sense of a sta­ble self and iden­ti­ty. When “too much” we may become exces­sive­ly self-pro­tec­tive, defen­sive and ego cen­tered; when too lit­tle, we may drown in a sense of unwor­thi­ness or nihilism.

Des­tiny: This voice enabling us to trust and take action toward our ful­fill­ment as human beings. When it is impaired or not present, we may end up hav­ing a sense that our lives are emp­ty or wast­ed. When this voice is “too much” (too active) we can become haunt­ed or dri­ven by arche­types that are beyond our con­trol; when “too lit­tle” we can become risk adverse and dri­ven by convention.

DSC_0006

In our indi­vid­u­al­is­tic cul­ture, the bal­ance between the voic­es of self-truth and self-kind­ness may be dis­tort­ed — tipped toward extremes on one side or the oth­er: too many inner judg­ments with too lit­tle self-pro­tec­tion or vice ver­sa. I’m guess­ing this is why a con­tem­po­rary trend in lead­er­ship toward stronger self-kind­ness is com­mon giv­en that too many lead­ers har­bor and give too much weight to self-crit­i­cal voic­es. The point is that with­out a bet­ter bal­ance the voice of des­tiny and ful­fill­ment has less of a chance to make itself known. 

There are all kinds of prob­lems when truth and kind­ness are out of bal­ance — in either direc­tion. Either in a self-pro­tec­tive and enti­tled way I think oth­ers are hold­ing me back or I self-sab­o­tage based on a belief I do not actu­al­ly deserve a good life and there­fore approach life cau­tious­ly as I wor­ry about oth­ers’ judg­ments. When the voic­es are out of sync or dis­tort­ed, a por­tal clos­es down, one that brings free­dom, insight, and auton­o­my and is sup­port­ive of a per­son­’s dis­cov­er­ies of what they find they are meant to do, what kind of leader they are meant to be. With­out that por­tal, the intu­itions that might car­ry me toward a sense of inner pur­pose and ful­fill­ment remain buried. When I con­sid­er who I am meant to be, I feel like I’m fac­ing a blank wall. Intro­spec­tion seems to fail every time as I drift into con­flict­ed thoughts and feel­ings. I may find myself giv­ing up, both scoff­ing at the notion of a des­tiny, mean­ing or pur­pose while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly and maybe uncon­scious­ly still yearn­ing for their pres­ence in my life. 

What is this voice of des­tiny, any­way? It can feel too fog­gy at first and too inter­mit­tent to describe or trust. The por­tal opens slow­ly. Because it seems almost word­less, peo­ple can wor­ry it is too spir­i­tu­al, reli­gious or mys­ti­cal to under­stand or sim­ply has no real­i­ty. That, itself, may be the voice of self-truth over­act­ing its part and car­ry­ing too much ratio­nal­iz­ing pow­er. Just so, when the sig­nals aren’t per­fect­ly clear, the voice of self-kind­ness can also over-react, dri­ving an indi­vid­ual into self-pity and vic­tim-think­ing instead of encour­ag­ing us to drop the buck­et ever deep­er into the well as a mat­ter of respon­si­bil­i­ty. Some­body did some­thing to me in the past and there­fore ful­fill­ment will nev­er come — it’s not meant for me.

When, how­ev­er, a per­son enacts the right bal­ance, most often in a trust­ing and sup­port­ive envi­ron­ment and most often hav­ing won already won some hard-fought bat­tles against what­ev­er inner lies might be there, the voice of des­tiny makes its way for­ward, still word­less, per­haps, but present and pow­er­ful. Maybe it will appear sim­ply as an image of one’s heart’s desire. With that image may come a sense of how truth and com­pas­sion look when they “col­lab­o­rate.” Final­ly there is free­dom to act. Our ques­tions nat­u­ral­ly trans­form and the inner world begins to awak­en to its pos­si­bil­i­ties rather than repet­i­tive­ly drag itself through its imbal­anced, com­pet­ing func­tions. A per­son may find them­selves ask­ing and answer­ing, “What do I real­ly want? or What am I gen­uine­ly drawn to? or What is a good life for me? And the world can then become open, as well, and intense­ly beau­ti­ful. The next ques­tion arrives in its own time — which is to say per­fect­ly on-time: “Indeed,” the voice of des­tiny asks, “what’s next?”


If you are inter­est­ed in refin­ing your capac­i­ty to find inner answers to chal­leng­ing dilem­mas, you may be inter­est­ed in “The Riv­er Lis­tens Work­shop,” held in March 2024 in Sedona, Ari­zona. You can find out more about this small group learn­ing event by access­ing this down­load­able pdf brochure.

By Dan Oestreich

I am a consultant, coach, facilitator and trainer supporting the growth and development of leaders and teams. For further information about my work and services, please access my Oestreich Associates website.

5 comments

  1. Dan,
    Your arti­cle sug­gests that if these voic­es are out of bal­ance, we might face prob­lems in life, might think oth­ers are hold­ing us back, or we might not believe in our­selves. You empha­size the impor­tance of bal­anc­ing these voic­es to find our pur­pose and des­tiny. Fur­ther­more, the voice of des­tiny might seem unclear or hard to trust, but when we strike the right bal­ance among the voic­es, we under­stand what we want and our life becomes more mean­ing­ful. It is essen­tial to under­stand and lis­ten to these inter­nal voic­es to make the best deci­sions for our lives. We must acknowl­edge our strengths and weak­ness­es, be kind to our­selves, and strive towards our goals with determination.
    In my years of work­ing with clients, for­mal­ly and infor­mal­ly, one of the ques­tions I always ask is “what gets in the way of…” (In this case bal­ance between and among the voices)
    It may seem trite, not intel­lec­tu­al enough, off the mark, etc. but in all of my years of expe­ri­ence one thing I found to be true is that our phys­i­cal health is inte­gral to sus­tain­ing a har­mo­nious bal­ance among the three inter­nal voic­es. A healthy diet, reg­u­lar exer­cise, ample sleep, and stress man­age­ment are cru­cial facets of main­tain­ing this equi­lib­ri­um. When we are phys­i­cal­ly fit, we fos­ter a health­i­er Self-Truth, as we are bet­ter equipped to face real­i­ties and accept truths about our­selves. Exer­cise, for instance, is known to boost self-esteem and pos­i­tiv­i­ty, nur­tur­ing the voice of Self-Kind­ness. Ade­quate rest and stress man­age­ment tech­niques, on the oth­er hand, pro­vide men­tal clar­i­ty and focus, key ele­ments in hear­ing our voice of Des­tiny. There­fore, phys­i­cal health is not just an aspect of our well=being, but also a cat­a­lyst that enables these voic­es to func­tion in a way that sup­ports us pos­i­tive­ly, rather than negatively.
    Great food for thought, Dan!! Thank you.

  2. Love­ly, Peter. I hearti­ly agree. When we are phys­i­cal­ly at our best and car­ing for our­selves through nutri­tious food, ade­quate sleep, and exer­cise, we are bet­ter equipped to keep oth­er aspects of our lives in balance. 

    BTW, Do you know the book, “No Bad Parts: Heal­ing Trau­ma and Restor­ing Whole­ness with the Inter­nal Fam­i­ly Sys­tems Mod­el” by Richard Schwartz. I think you’d like it a lot as it sug­gests what­ev­er voic­es we attend to in our­selves fall into cat­e­gories. The more we under­stand those cat­e­gories, the bet­ter able we are to release appar­ent­ly neg­a­tive ones to play dif­fer­ent, more con­struc­tive inter­nal roles. A voice that seems harsh and self-crit­i­cal can be present most­ly to pro­tect a per­son from doing them­selves some kind of harm. If we can sen­si­tive­ly inquire what role that part of us would like to play, we may find that what we once was a painful, dark, “bad” part actu­al­ly would like to assume a dif­fer­ent role in our lives. It’s very good. A nice gift to self and Self.

    Thanks again for your engage­ment in the dia­logue, Peter!

  3. Dan, I’m famil­iar with Inter­nal Fam­i­ly Sys­tems but not with Richard Schwartz in the sense I have not read him personally.

    I also come from a dif­fer­ent “school of thought” with respect to those inner voic­es. My train­ing has been to under­stand that these voic­es that are judg­men­tal in some way, shape or form are not “me,” but are the voic­es of every author­i­ty fig­ure I’ve had in my life begin­ning in ear­ly child­hood, first with the moth­er, and par­ents or pri­ma­ry care­givers, imme­di­ate fam­i­ly, rel­a­tives, friends, teach­ers, cler­gy, etc., etc. Over time, not hav­ing processed source of these voic­es, we go through life believ­ing these voic­es are “me.”

    Once we under­stand that con­cept, we can begin to use the tools that are help­ful in giv­ing us per­spec­tive, on the one hand, and the men­tal, phys­i­cal (bio-ener­get­ics) and psycho/spiritual capac­i­ties and resources to stand back and view our­selves from with­out, with sep­a­ra­tion, so that we can more eas­i­ly access our inner resources: — Essen­tial will, strength, courage, Right Know­ing, Right Under­stand­ing and Right Action, etc. to move for­ward from the place of inner peace and calm and respon­sive­ness rather than emo­tion­al reactivity.

    But, that’s just me. Thanks again for the inter­est­ing article.

  4. Peter~
    A favorite ques­tion I ask when dis­cussing per­son­al pat­terns in think­ing, feel­ing or behav­ior is “Who did you learn that from?” or “Where did you learn that?” For me, one ele­ment of that con­di­tion­ing goes back to the Hof­man Quadrin­i­ty Process. See: https://www.hoffmaninstitute.org/the-process/. And odd­ly enough, anoth­er strand goes back to work in human resources in the dis­tant past in which I learned some­thing about behav­ioral pat­terns via con­struc­tion of assess­ment cen­ters. I’m a big believ­er in step­ping back, learn­ing to observe self. See also, the Her­mit card in the Tarot.

  5. Effec­tive ques­tions, Dan. Root Cause stuff. Anoth­er one, “Is that the first time you felt that way?” As you, trac­ing back to the source — being curi­ous about pat­terned behav­ior. Few emo­tion­al reac­tions are “one-offs.” The Hermit…very cool! Intro­spec­tion and soli­tude — the way in ‑where the “answers” almost always live. Love this stuff, Dan. Chal­leng­ing for me at the out­set of my spir­i­tu­al journey…and now much eas­i­er for me to be more curi­ous than defen­sive and/or resistant.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.