I start from the idea that a person’s growth as a leader is related to understanding and transcending older conditioned emotions and conditioned responses, especially those patterns of thinking, feeling and action that induce us to play smaller or larger than we are.
Take, for example, a leader who happened to grow up in a household where she often mediated conflicts and created harmony between her parents, how she somehow ended up playing a similar role as head of her company with members of her senior team — to the detriment of the team’s decision-making. In a way she had to learn how to resolve the conditions of her childhood in order to release the full leadership presence she was called to express and occupy the role she was meant to play. It’s not that she was inadequate to her executive role; she wasn’t and she was beloved by her team, but everybody recognized there were times when she was not using her personal and organizational authority to actually weigh in with her own views, making her own choices in the midst of team conflict.
Or take another leader, someone who is biracial with an international background, whose full “education” via prestigious schools involved learning to keep his head down, treat powerful others with deference (even if undeserved), and do more than his peers to get the same or lesser rewards.
In this second case, as he became increasingly successful in the work that followed his education, he could feel old patterns arising. Denied the advancement of his ideas by the powers above him, he held onto a limiting job role far longer than he could or should have. He kept trying, kept waiting for recognition, kept feeling unappreciated, unheard and both internally and externally stuck. He became self-questioning. He asked himself if all his education and work experience would only result in him leaving his current job, disappointing or angering others on the way out, only to find the same problems elsewhere. He progressed when he began trusting himself in spite of the “one-down” conditioning to which he’d been subjected. He searched out a better job and he took it, not letting others or guilt from old conditioning define him.
The first of these stories is about not taking hold of one’s personal authority; the second is about finding it over time. There are just as many stories about the “Big Hat, No Cattle” phenomenon of individuals attempting to play larger than their authority warrants. I’m not talking about those with imposter syndrome (that’s another version of not grasping personal authority). I’m talking about the opposite, where a certain amount of gall defines a person’s presence. Here I think of a couple of consultant colleagues who made exorbitant demands of their clients. Said one: “Either I report directly to the president or I resign!” while another bragged: “Pretty soon I’ll be able to get rid of that manager who’s blocking the Program!” Neither was successful and both were soon gone. Yikes! Such examples also feel to me like conditioned responses, ones confusing personal authority with ego — old selves still in control of a person who wants to lead.
It takes something to break out of such powerful patterns. Either too much or too little personal authority is problematic. Achieving the right balance is a quest that is not only about a kind of personal psychological liberation, but also about finding the right ways to be present and to connect with other human beings. As long as the patterns and priorities of an older self remain, our light is either hidden beneath the proverbial bushel basket or is turned up a little too high. Both it seems to me ultimately avoid the risk of being ourselves. Personal authority is innately needed to lead and, if I have it right, is about doing things that both release us to be our full selves and also help us connect to others at the core.


In my work with leaders, Dan, I’ve found that journaling supported leaders (actually all others) to focus on their thoughts, reactions, and feelings about their interactions and decisions at work. This practice can help one to uncover/discover patterns that may be rooted in childhood responses. Recognizing these patterns is the first step towards change, growth, and further development — personal and professional. In my experience, this practice can support choosing actions that align more closely with their authentic selves rather than reacting out of habit. This shift not only promotes personal growth but can lead to more authentic and effective leadership styles.
Another approach I use is to suggest others continuously seek out and constructively work with feedback from peers, mentors, and team members (and spouses/partners…). This experience can help one become aware (more aware) and/or recognize when they might be defaulting to learned (childhood) behaviors, such as avoiding conflict due to early family dynamics or behaving in a deferential manner that undermines their authority.
By creating an environment where feedback is regularly exchanged, leaders (all of us!) can gain insight into how their actions and decisions are perceived by others, offering valuable clues about when they might be falling into old patterns. This awareness makes it possible to consciously adjust behaviors in ways that are more aligned with their true selves.
Great post, Dan. Thank you.
Thanks, Peter! Yes, journaling, feedback and other tools, such as intensive personal development workshops (I think of the Hoffman Quadrinity Process (https://www.hoffmaninstitute.org/the-process/) can be of material help in identifying old patterns. I would emphasize this is often harder work than people may at first recognize. Even when the patterns are clear, it may not be so easy to disrupt them. For example, a client I was working with today has dealt with a persistent pattern of self-sabotage and success avoidance. She’s known of the pattern for years, worked with a therapist for years, and has continued to suffer for years while gradually learning how to interrupt the old identify coming back again and again. Self-compassion and self-care and some patience and support can help a lot! Although knowing is necessary it may be insufficient, it seems, and each person’s journey appears to ripen in its own time. I have used this comparison before: water gradually builds up on a leaf until one day it dips and a drop falls. That’s why it’s called a journey.
Thank you again, Peter. Your insights are always so valuable to the Work, capital W.
Best
Dan
Dan,
“Time heals…” If we are conscious and are willing to do what it takes. It’s not an intellectual/cognitive “knowing” process alone (IMO). Touching in…the self-love and compassion you speak of are important ingredients, antidotes. A journey, indeed. That’s why we’re “down here.” Personally, my process (https://www.diamondapproach.org/teaching)