On Personal Authority, Freedom and Connection

I start from the idea that a per­son­’s growth as a leader is relat­ed to under­stand­ing and tran­scend­ing old­er con­di­tioned emo­tions and con­di­tioned respons­es, espe­cial­ly those pat­terns of think­ing, feel­ing and action that induce us to play small­er or larg­er than we are.

Take, for exam­ple, a leader who hap­pened to grow up in a house­hold where she often medi­at­ed con­flicts and cre­at­ed har­mo­ny between her par­ents, how she some­how end­ed up play­ing a sim­i­lar role as head of her com­pa­ny with mem­bers of her senior team — to the detri­ment of the team’s deci­sion-mak­ing. In a way she had to learn how to resolve the con­di­tions of her child­hood in order to release the full lead­er­ship pres­ence she was called to express and occu­py the role she was meant to play. It’s not that she was inad­e­quate to her exec­u­tive role; she was­n’t and she was beloved by her team, but every­body rec­og­nized there were times when she was not using her per­son­al and orga­ni­za­tion­al author­i­ty to actu­al­ly weigh in with her own views, mak­ing her own choic­es in the midst of team conflict.

_DKO9719

Or take anoth­er leader, some­one who is bira­cial with an inter­na­tion­al back­ground, whose full “edu­ca­tion” via pres­ti­gious schools involved learn­ing to keep his head down, treat pow­er­ful oth­ers with def­er­ence (even if unde­served), and do more than his peers to get the same or less­er rewards.

In this sec­ond case, as he became increas­ing­ly suc­cess­ful in the work that fol­lowed his edu­ca­tion, he could feel old pat­terns aris­ing. Denied the advance­ment of his ideas by the pow­ers above him, he held onto a lim­it­ing job role far longer than he could or should have. He kept try­ing, kept wait­ing for recog­ni­tion, kept feel­ing unap­pre­ci­at­ed, unheard and both inter­nal­ly and exter­nal­ly stuck. He became self-ques­tion­ing. He asked him­self if all his edu­ca­tion and work expe­ri­ence would only result in him leav­ing his cur­rent job, dis­ap­point­ing or anger­ing oth­ers on the way out, only to find the same prob­lems else­where. He pro­gressed when he began trust­ing him­self in spite of the “one-down” con­di­tion­ing to which he’d been sub­ject­ed. He searched out a bet­ter job and he took it, not let­ting oth­ers or guilt from old con­di­tion­ing define him.

The first of these sto­ries is about not tak­ing hold of one’s per­son­al author­i­ty; the sec­ond is about find­ing it over time. There are just as many sto­ries about the “Big Hat, No Cat­tle” phe­nom­e­non of indi­vid­u­als attempt­ing to play larg­er than their author­i­ty war­rants. I’m not talk­ing about those with imposter syn­drome (that’s anoth­er ver­sion of not grasp­ing per­son­al author­i­ty). I’m talk­ing about the oppo­site, where a cer­tain amount of gall defines a per­son­’s pres­ence. Here I think of a cou­ple of con­sul­tant col­leagues who made exor­bi­tant demands of their clients. Said one: “Either I report direct­ly to the pres­i­dent or I resign!” while anoth­er bragged: “Pret­ty soon I’ll be able to get rid of that man­ag­er who’s block­ing the Pro­gram!” Nei­ther was suc­cess­ful and both were soon gone. Yikes! Such exam­ples also feel to me like con­di­tioned respons­es, ones con­fus­ing per­son­al author­i­ty with ego — old selves still in con­trol of a per­son who wants to lead.

It takes some­thing to break out of such pow­er­ful pat­terns. Either too much or too lit­tle per­son­al author­i­ty is prob­lem­at­ic. Achiev­ing the right bal­ance is a quest that is not only about a kind of per­son­al psy­cho­log­i­cal lib­er­a­tion, but also about find­ing the right ways to be present and to con­nect with oth­er human beings. As long as the pat­terns and pri­or­i­ties of an old­er self remain, our light is either hid­den beneath the prover­bial bushel bas­ket or is turned up a lit­tle too high. Both it seems to me ulti­mate­ly avoid the risk of being our­selves. Per­son­al author­i­ty is innate­ly need­ed to lead and, if I have it right, is about doing things that both release us to be our full selves and also help us con­nect to oth­ers at the core.

_DKO9762

By Dan Oestreich

I am a consultant, coach, facilitator and trainer supporting the growth and development of leaders and teams. For further information about my work and services, please access my Oestreich Associates website.

3 comments

  1. In my work with lead­ers, Dan, I’ve found that jour­nal­ing sup­port­ed lead­ers (actu­al­ly all oth­ers) to focus on their thoughts, reac­tions, and feel­ings about their inter­ac­tions and deci­sions at work. This prac­tice can help one to uncover/discover pat­terns that may be root­ed in child­hood respons­es. Rec­og­niz­ing these pat­terns is the first step towards change, growth, and fur­ther devel­op­ment — per­son­al and pro­fes­sion­al. In my expe­ri­ence, this prac­tice can sup­port choos­ing actions that align more close­ly with their authen­tic selves rather than react­ing out of habit. This shift not only pro­motes per­son­al growth but can lead to more authen­tic and effec­tive lead­er­ship styles.

    Anoth­er approach I use is to sug­gest oth­ers con­tin­u­ous­ly seek out and con­struc­tive­ly work with feed­back from peers, men­tors, and team mem­bers (and spouses/partners…). This expe­ri­ence can help one become aware (more aware) and/or rec­og­nize when they might be default­ing to learned (child­hood) behav­iors, such as avoid­ing con­flict due to ear­ly fam­i­ly dynam­ics or behav­ing in a def­er­en­tial man­ner that under­mines their authority. 

    By cre­at­ing an envi­ron­ment where feed­back is reg­u­lar­ly exchanged, lead­ers (all of us!) can gain insight into how their actions and deci­sions are per­ceived by oth­ers, offer­ing valu­able clues about when they might be falling into old pat­terns. This aware­ness makes it pos­si­ble to con­scious­ly adjust behav­iors in ways that are more aligned with their true selves.

    Great post, Dan. Thank you.

  2. Thanks, Peter! Yes, jour­nal­ing, feed­back and oth­er tools, such as inten­sive per­son­al devel­op­ment work­shops (I think of the Hoff­man Quadrin­i­ty Process (https://www.hoffmaninstitute.org/the-process/) can be of mate­r­i­al help in iden­ti­fy­ing old pat­terns. I would empha­size this is often hard­er work than peo­ple may at first rec­og­nize. Even when the pat­terns are clear, it may not be so easy to dis­rupt them. For exam­ple, a client I was work­ing with today has dealt with a per­sis­tent pat­tern of self-sab­o­tage and suc­cess avoid­ance. She’s known of the pat­tern for years, worked with a ther­a­pist for years, and has con­tin­ued to suf­fer for years while grad­u­al­ly learn­ing how to inter­rupt the old iden­ti­fy com­ing back again and again. Self-com­pas­sion and self-care and some patience and sup­port can help a lot! Although know­ing is nec­es­sary it may be insuf­fi­cient, it seems, and each per­son­’s jour­ney appears to ripen in its own time. I have used this com­par­i­son before: water grad­u­al­ly builds up on a leaf until one day it dips and a drop falls. That’s why it’s called a journey. 

    Thank you again, Peter. Your insights are always so valu­able to the Work, cap­i­tal W.

    Best
    Dan

  3. Dan,
    “Time heals…” If we are con­scious and are will­ing to do what it takes. It’s not an intellectual/cognitive “know­ing” process alone (IMO). Touch­ing in…the self-love and com­pas­sion you speak of are impor­tant ingre­di­ents, anti­dotes. A jour­ney, indeed. That’s why we’re “down here.” Per­son­al­ly, my process (https://www.diamondapproach.org/teaching)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.