The Power of Mea Culpa

As a coach who works with all kinds of lead­ers, it’s inevitable that a cer­tain per­cent­age don’t come vol­un­tar­i­ly. That does­n’t mean they aren’t excit­ed to work with me; it means some­body else has said they need to find some­one to work with — in some cas­es with an implied “or else.” What I find in work­ing with this group is not resis­tance to me or the process of coach­ing, but some­times to their own turn toward self-reflec­tion and self-leadership. 

It’s hard when you’ve been told you have a prob­lem to accept that indeed you have a prob­lem. The nat­ur­al response is to explain away, avoid or block cer­tain infor­ma­tion. With some clients, it’s appar­ent this has all hap­pened before and so now it may be a kind of intel­lec­tu­al­ized game. With oth­ers, it’s a very gen­uine effort to find a way to sup­port them­selves in the face of neg­a­tive, maybe dev­as­tat­ing feedback. 

_DKO8119

There are lots of rea­sons why some­one would resist dif­fi­cult infor­ma­tion — a typ­i­cal expla­na­tion being that it vio­lates a per­son­’s self-con­cept in some way. The indi­vid­ual is get­ting infor­ma­tion that says, “you are not who you think you are.” And when iden­ti­ty is on the line you can bet the inter­nal psy­cho­log­i­cal pro­tec­tion sys­tems move to high alert. If there’s been trau­ma, the per­son may sud­den­ly revert to what­ev­er cop­ing mech­a­nism they’ve used in the past: shut­ting down, falling down a rab­bit-hole of guilt or shame, or dis­so­ci­at­ing from their feel­ings, often in favor of argu­ments and intense denials, cov­er-ups and min­i­miza­tion. Dimin­ish­ing the impor­tance of the feed­back and the per­son­’s impact on oth­ers are common. 

The point is that there’s some­thing miss­ing in the response and the per­son has lost some capac­i­ty to accept respon­si­bil­i­ty for part of their thoughts, feel­ings and behav­ior. Oth­ers pick up on that blind spot quick­ly. Well-mean­ing friends and col­leagues may have tried to give the per­son feed­back. Yet those attempts con­sis­tent­ly died in denials and dou­bling downs. Peo­ple give up. “The per­son­’s just not coach­able” they say. Oth­ers do their best to work around the prob­lem, but inevitably dif­fi­cult behav­ior cre­ates mis­trust and if that behav­ior becomes too egre­gious, it draws forth some form of orga­ni­za­tion­al action — the let­ter of coun­sel, for exam­ple, along with refer­ral to some­one like me.

I’ve found it use­ful to remem­ber that there have cer­tain­ly been times in my own life when I’ve resist­ed the turn toward self-con­fronta­tion and respon­si­bil­i­ty, as prob­a­bly we all have now and again — as hard as that might be to acknowl­edge. We have our own pat­terns of too much or too lit­tle shame, with the effect that nei­ther pat­tern offers an accu­rate reflec­tion of who we are. Some­times, I know for myself it has tak­en a long time — years — to make the turn.

There is a beau­ti­ful Latin phrase — mea cul­pa. It means, “my fault” or “through my fault.” Although its ori­gin is in a Catholic prayer of con­fes­sion, I think we can eas­i­ly enough cut any strands that some­how tie this phrase to reli­gion. To me it is more like a sign­post at a very pre­dictable cross­road. Can you go down that road? If you can, the way may be rocky and you’ll sweat. And if you can­not, then you inevitably enter a crowd­ed city where every­one is a sep­a­rate com­peti­tor, where you’ll have to prove now and for­ev­er that you were right after all, again and again. 

That is a hell of a price. And, of course, the price isn’t so clear in the begin­ning. As a client of mine told me the oth­er day: “I see lots of pro­fes­sion­al col­leagues who are okay apol­o­giz­ing over lit­tle things — the late RSVP, the ‘sor­ry I missed the meet­ing’ note, the ‘I was try­ing to be fun­ny’ apol­o­gy.” He con­tin­ued, “but they have a much hard­er time when it comes down to the big­ger stuff — the pat­tern of under­min­ing deci­sions, the neg­a­tive (and maybe sex­ist or racist) char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of some­one else’s work, the patron­iz­ing exclu­sions, the betray­als of con­fi­dences. Called out on that stuff, there’s no end to the ratio­nal­iza­tions.” He’s describ­ing the clas­sic exam­ple of a slip­pery slope.

How then do we coach our­selves? How do we even get there, to that moment when a gen­uine mea cul­pa is viewed as strength? Because with­out it growth is slowed and maybe denied altogether. 

I think that’s a ques­tion that has to be answered inter­nal­ly and for your­self alone — which is pre­cise­ly what gives it its pow­er. Such is the nature of a cross­roads. It requires you to make a per­son­al choice. If the cross­road is real, it requires you make the turn ful­ly on your own.

_DKO8277

By Dan Oestreich

I am a consultant, coach, facilitator and trainer supporting the growth and development of leaders and teams. For further information about my work and services, please access my Oestreich Associates website.

3 comments

  1. Dan, I’ve been read­ing your posts for some time. I think this is your best to date. 

    Some reflec­tions:

    Resis­tance to acknowl­edg­ing one’s own flaws or short­com­ings is a com­mon human response, often root­ed in the fear of dis­man­tling one’s self-concept. 

    Resis­tance is the mech­a­nisms to pro­tect one’s ego from per­ceived threats. Reac­tiv­i­ty stems from a dis­con­nec­tion from one’s core essence. 

    Often child­hood trau­ma can exac­er­bate this resis­tance, caus­ing indi­vid­u­als to resort to famil­iar cop­ing mech­a­nisms as you so well point out, Dan. (And, it’s impor­tant to under­stand that these cop­ing mech­a­nisms can be unlearned and replaced with health­i­er approach­es through self-reflec­tion and self-compassion.)

    The con­cept of “mea cul­pa” sym­bol­izes the will­ing­ness to accept respon­si­bil­i­ty for one’s actions, acknowl­edg­ing per­son­al faults and embrac­ing vulnerability. 

    In spir­i­tu­al psy­chol­o­gy, this act is seen as a pow­er­ful step toward self-lib­er­a­tion. It’s a recog­ni­tion that growth and trans­for­ma­tion come from acknowl­edg­ing and learn­ing from mis­takes rather than defend­ing or ratio­nal­iz­ing them.

    To coach our­selves and oth­ers in this jour­ney of self-aware­ness and embrac­ing the “mea cul­pa” mind­set, coach­es, ther­a­pists, psy­chol­o­gists, social work­ers, and oth­er help­ing pro­fes­sion­al turned to sev­er­al practices: 

    Mind­ful­ness and Self-Reflec­tion: Reg­u­lar mind­ful­ness prac­tices and intro­spec­tive exer­cis­es can pave the way for under­stand­ing one’s pat­terns of resis­tance and avoidance.

    Com­pas­sion­ate Self-Inquiry: Instead of judg­ment, approach self-inquiry with self-com­pas­sion. Ask ques­tions like, “Who or what is my resis­tance pro­tect­ing? What deep­er fears are at play?”

    Shad­ow Work: explor­ing the parts of our­selves we’ve dis­owned or denied. It requires courage to face these aspects and inte­grate them into our con­scious awareness.

    Rad­i­cal Accep­tance: Embrac­ing the idea that growth involves accept­ing imper­fec­tions. Accep­tance does­n’t mean con­don­ing harm­ful behav­ior; it means acknowl­edg­ing it with­out judg­ment and com­mit­ting to change.

    Cul­ti­vat­ing Vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty: Embrac­ing vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty allows one to dis­man­tle their walls of self-defense and con­nect with oth­ers on a deep­er, authen­tic level.

    Spir­i­tu­al Prac­tices: Engage in prac­tices that fos­ter con­nec­tion with one’s spir­i­tu­al self. Med­i­ta­tion, con­tem­pla­tion, and prayer can sup­port your jour­ney toward self-awareness.

    I’ve often believed that when the “pain” (men­tal, phys­i­cal, emo­tion­al, spir­i­tu­al and/or psy­cho­log­i­cal) gets too great, often, not always, but often one will turn to seek support.

    I also believe that it’s a long life and if folks don’t “get it” in this life­time, they’ll get it in the next, or the next. But, even­tu­al­ly, every­one is going “home.” It’s just that the jour­ney is dif­fer­ent for each pilgrim.

    Thanks so much for this!

  2. Peter –
    As always, you’ve added depth and breadth to my post. Part of the chal­lenge does seem to be that the steps you’ve list­ed are ones that peo­ple choose. They adopt these prac­tices, but there is always a ques­tion of how the ini­tial choice hap­pens, the first choice to acknowl­edge the blind spot, to accept that yes I am at least part of the prob­lem? The oth­er prac­tices then are released.

    Pain can do it, dis­tress of all kinds can push peo­ple toward reflec­tion, but not always. There’s no guar­an­tee that just because some­one is suf­fer­ing, they will auto­mat­i­cal­ly turn to exam­ine how they are them­selves the source of this suf­fer­ing. So the prob­lem I am pre­sent­ing here is one of the ini­tial turn, mak­ing that turn. The “cross­road” is just a metaphor for a moment of self-con­fronta­tion and self-accep­tance. A spark, a bud, the sound of water as a frog jumps into the pond — some­thing illu­mi­nates the moment and a turn becomes pos­si­ble, when the per­son is ready. But what do we mean by “ready?”

  3. “The “cross­road” is just a metaphor for a moment of self-con­fronta­tion and self-accep­tance. A spark, a bud, the sound of water as a frog jumps into the pond — some­thing illu­mi­nates the moment and a turn becomes pos­si­ble, when the per­son is ready”

    Agree, Dan. Each per­son­’s soul responds in its on unique way, and no response is a response. And, yes, it’s not always about pain. I think ready means that one’s soul says it’s time to take a next step and this nudge, or pull, maybe grand, maybe sub­tle, is the ener­gy that sup­ports this transition.

    The mys­tery.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.